Skip to main content

Train Theory and What Not

I've been cheating. I've not been writing as regularly as I promised myself to write. Missed out days. It's more like a chore than anything else. Yet it may be the only worthwhile thing that I'm doing. At least these few months.

I used to avidly recommend Train Theory to all and sundry. It is what saved me from going insane out of grief after my breakup (c. Dec-Mar 2011). Yet Train Theory has a catch. A very critical catch. It's more of a question of balance than anything else. But before all this confuses you, let me give a very basic outline of Train Theory.

Train Theory


When one travels in a train, one may observe a large building in view. The building may be huge in size and appear never ending. However, large as the building might appear to be, if one merely looks away from the window for a few moments, one will see that the building has receded into the distance and is considerably diminished in appearance. Soon after, the building disappears from all but memory. 



Analogies:

Building: An emotional problem

Train: Life
Looking away: Distracting oneself

Thus we can infer that if any distressing/disturbing event manages to transpire in life, it will appear large and never ending. You will feel as if you will be miserable forever. Consequently, due to the very nature of the distress and indeed; human nature; you will keep on brooding about it and framing (hypothetical) alternative solutions to solve the problem or ease your (apparently) lifelong misery. Train theory suggests that a suitable distraction method, if employed, will result in the problem diminishing due to it's being 'put in scope' i.e in the larger context of life and its progress, any problem appears small and inconsequential (unless of course it is a recurring one, but we discount its applicability in this theory).

Now the problem lies in selecting the nature of the distraction. It has to possess certain characteristics:
  • It has to be sufficiently engaging so as to provide sufficient distraction
  • It has to be interesting in nature so that one does it regularly
  • It can be either constructive or non constructive in nature
Now the third point is what matters in the selection. In a way it does decide the nature of the first and second points because very few constructive activities manage to satisfy the first two points! For example reading is a constructive activity and it can satisfy all three points. However, even in reading, the genre of the novel in question can add a whole new dimension to the third. When one is depressed or despondent, one generally prefers reading lighter material viz. fantasy fiction or light 'chick-lit' novels. I have found out, through personal experience that; much like a drug addiction; this genre too is greatly appealing so much so that one rarely goes back to reading 'healthier' stuff. And of course there is no intellectual development reading 'junk' much as there is little to be gained physically by eating only junk food.

Hence the choice of distraction is paramount, as I found out through personal experience and much to my cost.... Wish you all the best.

Comments

  1. This is some nice thinking-through-writing :)

    This: "if any distressing/disturbing event manages to transpire in life, it will appear large and never ending" reminded me of the Time Traveler's wife (love that book for the layers the story is woven in) where Henry keeps going back to these major events in his life. In a sense it really was never ending there. Sigh.

    And that was information you didn't need. But what the hell. Word vomiting seems to be my only virtue!
    Good work, keep em coming.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you. I have to read that book then. :D

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey! here's my email: sucheta.tiwari@gmail.com
    and facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sucheta.tiwari

    And the book kind of reads as a romance novel, though it has elements of the free will versus chaos debate and a brilliant take on bereavement. Then again, I am biased. Read other reviews before you buy it :P

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ok. Name the book again :P forgot.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Companion

A gray-walled room with a window. That's how he remembers it. It looks the same now: a large window in a small room. It makes the room look even smaller. The window-sill is thick with dust. Beams of sunlight stream in singly, their path illuminated by many-sided dust particles spinning. Or seeming to spin. Is the room this dusty everywhere? He wonders to himself, trying not to breathe it in. The sunbeams merely illuminate what's already there. Slowly, as his eyes adjust, more details of the room start revealing themselves. The room is bare. Devoid of anything except walls and tiny patches of plaster embedded in the cobwebs at corners. The effect is almost artistic. He wonders if rooms could feel. If they could, what would this room be feeling. Do they remember the people who lived in them? It's almost impossible to believe that people would have lived here once. The walls would have been new and shining with paint and resonant with echoes of laughter or tears or screams.

Patriotism and Parti(san)ng Sorrows

Is patriotism overrated? What is patriotism anyway? An irrational love for ones country irrespective of regional, ethnic, religious or cultural differences. Why is patriotism? It is obvious. To build a 'nation' one must have people who relate to one another so that they can see beyond the short boundaries of personal/familial interest and look towards the interest of the group as a whole. Ideally, the relation can be ideological in nature. However, historical evidence and the knowledge of human nature leads to the conclusion that as humans are irrational beings, thus they can be governed by principles of irrationality. This is done using the concept of patriotism. Patriotism (or nationalism, or social-nationalism or national socialism or nazism... see where I'm going with this?) is but a name for the Universal Method. Now the Universal Method goes by many names and flavours that differ subtly from one another in their means of execution or agenda, but essentially they

The Flash

It is night. J walks the intermittently lit streets of the city. He is not thinking anything in particular. Thoughts flit randomly across the landscape of his weary mind. It has been a tough day. Not so much tiring as wearying. He is searching for the answer to a very important question. It is a logic-altering question. One that has plagued perhaps every mind since the dawn of time: identity. What is it? Does something like a true identity exist? However, he is not really thinking. The thought is running in a constant rhythm through his mind, much as the drone of a machine. A few steps ahead. A streetlight is flickering on and off. Each state endures for a few seconds and is accompanied by an unusual rustling noise. J is intrigued. He walks until he is directly beneath the light. There is an alleyway leading off to the right. By the light of the flickering lamp he is able to discern a human shape seated on a pile of nondescript boxes. He stands still and waits for the next flash of i